Abstract

”A Web community is simply a community that happens to exist online rather than in the physical world." -Amy Jo Kim (2000)
Goals & Aims: The goal of this study is to show how, critical and theoretical material on virtual communities relates to a specific, ongoing ‘community of interest’. The main aim of the presentation format is to deliver the information and results in a way conducive to participation. By combining both information and the opportunity to interact, the work not only stands as a contribution to the growing approaches to this field of inquiry but also becomes immediately peer-student-reviewed.
Objectives:
The main objective of this study is to establish whether or not the Covenant of Wildwood Gate constitutes an online, virtual community under the diversity of criteria set out in current research. The nature of the community is assessed against the likelihood of the members being comfortable with participation in metaphorical spaces, measuring to what extent their experiences online are enhanced through a conceptual sense of place.
Methodology:
The case study delineates findings from a specific community of interest, reporting the outcomes of research and inquiry. Every aspect of the study is linked to and referenced by academic research, scholarly papers and online journals and books showing how the Covenant of Wildwood Gate both conforms and at times deviates from other observations and studies.
Please contribute by offering a comment on the goals, objective and methodology of this study. What would you do different? Same?
The idea of community has long had a central place in our social composition, but it was T”nnies (1887) who distinguished between community and society, placing the enduring aspect of social relationships in the context of modernity and the associated degeneration of traditional social structures.(Fernback & Thompson 1995) Over a century later, however, there is still no agreement on what constitutes ‘community’.
This case study is primarily a compare/cont
About the Covenant of Wildwood Gate:
The Wildwood Gate is an online forum, a meeting place for witches, shamans, druids and those of Celtic-related spiritualities and indigenous pagan traditions to share knowledge, insights and experiences in their common interest. Running almost continuously since 2001, it is not an open community. Membership is invitation only.
Prospective members (when the links are activated and they are directed to the forum) are referred to the moderator/author’s website and instructed to read some of her books, (Witchcraft Theory & Practice, When I see the Wild God), view the frequently asked questions and, if still interested, introduce themselves on the 'entry' part of the forum. This is the only area they can read or access at this time. They are warned to be ‘ready for an inquisition’.
Currently, all links to the forum have been suspended and no new memberships are under consideration. As a long-time friend of the author, I have had access and participated in this forum since the inception. Memberships fluctuate between 30 and 50 participants and the ‘intention statement’ follows:
“What we have is a place that we each and every one have respect for, based on an understanding. Having known each other for a while now, we are deep and friendly with one another. The connections run far in all directions, witch and fey alike. Some are Initiates, some not. What we have in common, regardless, is reverence.”
Metaphorical Spaces: Why do we need them?
The traditional definition of community includes location, describing it as a group of people in the same locality, the locality itself, or a group with common interests. (American Heritage Dectionary 1976) If we are looking for the location in online communities, where is it to be found?
Most scholarly investigations describe online experiences as taking place ‘somewhere’.
(Online) users often feel - consciously or subconsciously - that they are entering a "place" or "space" that is filled with a wide array of meanings and purposes. (Suler, 1996)
Stein Gotved further delineates the spaces of the internet into three distinct categories: the ‘interface space’, the ‘social space’ and the ‘metaphorical space’. The conceptual understanding of Gotved’s spatial dimensions and Suler’s sense of ‘place’ supports a traditional definition of community. The specific social and interactive exchanges online, both synchronous and asynchronous, and the potential to form community within that space are seen by these authors as natural.
The metaphorical space is purely epistemological, based on reconstructed reality and geography, and evokes the sense of a place. The typology holds the key to understanding many of the differences within online social life. (Gotved, 2002)
Gotved describes the social links to online communities in cyberspace as a relatively new model for human interactions. “Belonging goes to a certain place shared by certain people, and on the Internet, various locations are imagined through their address as a “there” in the vast online realm.” (Gotved, 2002)
Members of the Covenant of Wildwood Gate refer to their forum as a place, a distinct ‘somewhere’. In the mission statement above, new members are charged with holding reverence for this space.
From posts in 2005-2006 we find references to place and space:
Sha...: This place is Sacred, and we will not have it compromised.
Ci...: I am always here for anyone who wishes help …all you have to do is message me.
R...:W: It’s good to see you back here. Where have you been?
El...: I hope you have found your way easily through the many corridors of the wildwood gate…
Travelling to these non-corporeal ‘somewhere’s’ is nothing new in human evolution or experience. The ability to journey abstractly to a hypothetical space appears innate, enhanced in certain individuals throughout history, particularly shamans. (
One example of such an abstract journey is found in the Inuit ritual for communicating with Sedna, their life/death goddess of the
Along with shamanistic rituals, all cultures experience the existence of communities lacking physicality. Conceptual spaces such as Tartarus, the Dream-Time, Hades, Heaven and Nirvana testify to the ‘other worlds’ perpetuated through oral and literary traditions. (Green & Fletcher, 1997) The human propensity to journey to these non-corporeal spaces, and the fact that they exist at all, helps to understand better the nature of community online because it too is an abstract, non-corporeal space where people gather. Given the nature of Wildwood Gate members, such abstract, non-corporeal spaces are familiar territory, invoked off line through meditation, ritual and trance-like states.
Community, Identity and Cyber Space
Not all groups of people meeting online are communities. Chat rooms, for example, that are geared for singles looking to connect with others, or discussion boards concerned only with information exchange may not qualify as an online ‘community’ because they lack a sense of permeance and consistency among members. (Ridings & Gefen 2004) What does constitute a community is still debated among academics in this field and empirical studies have shown conflicting results. (Antonijevic 2005) Simply defining the word ‘community’ is problematic.
Rheingold’s view, based on his experiences in the WELL and research there, states that members of an online community do ‘everything’ that people do when they are together physically, only it is done with words on a computer screen, non-corporeal and non-temporal. (Rheingold 2002 p 58)
Reid interprets online communities as a postmodern phenomenon, requiring the deconstruction of many of the cultural tools and norms that form the basis of face to face interactions. (Reid 1991) She concludes that we need to reorient our thinking in the areas of linguistics, sociology and history to understand and evaluate these communities.
Wildwood Gate members develop relationships that build over time, some of which are conducted face to face as well as on the forum.
Wildwood Gate members engage in communication based not only on information exchange in the context of shared interests but personal experiences, feelings, fears, hopes, aspirations and views. Over time, members have developed enough trust to express real vulnerability and offer real support.
Some members of the Covenant of Wildwood Gate meet off line as well as in the forum. These experiences are not ‘separate’ but may actually complement each other. Dr. John Suler lists ways and means of integrating virtual reality community with face-face-community for mutual benefit. (Suler, 1996) :
1. Tell online companions about ones offline life.
2. Tell offline companions about ones online life.
3. Meet online people offline
4. Meet offline people online
5. Bring online behaviour offline
6. Bring offline behaviour online
By incorporating the social connections experienced through online spaces with those off line, Wildwood Gate members enhance their feeling of connection leading to more wholeness and authenticity. In this case, the personality can grow and flourish, though it is not always simple.
Text-only communications, equalization of status, and the opportunity for altering or hiding one's identity are all unique monkey wrenches tossed into the online group process. (Suler, 1996)
The questions of Identity: Who's Who?
One of those ‘monkey wrenches’ is the identity one brings with them when they enter online spaces. Much controversy revolves around the issues of identity appropriation, perhaps because a deeper psychological investigation has been lacking. Although sometimes problematic, the expression of diverse ‘sub-personalities’ is natural. (Falconer 2005b)
Everyone has an assorted ‘cast of characters’ in their unconscious and like any actor on stage, these characters have one aim—to be seen! (Greene & Sasportas, 1987 p. 165) Each ‘identity’ has something to offer though these personalities often have conflicting needs.
For example, one sub-personality might form around the archetype of self-sufficiency and pr
We exhibit one kind of behaviour at work, another at home, another at social gatherings and yet another on a country walk. Very often we slip in and out of our different identities without very much awareness of doing so. (Greene & Sasportas, 1987 p. 163)
The Covenant of Wildwood gate offers a chance to explore the divergent aspects of members’ personalties with greater consciousness. The members can select what parts of themselves they want to share, perhaps revealing sides of their nature previously repressed, denied or r
Although many authors are quick to point out the online perpetuation of social conditions though ‘identity appropriation’ such as racism, prostitution and other forms of identity based social oppression, (Nakamura, 2002) that there is an identity at all becomes key. Here the ‘self’ that one takes into online social spaces is no less immune to pathology than it is in any other aspect of life. (Falconer 2005b) These issues attest to the significance of the online community experience—and the need for new social-psychological principles to account for the varied and unusual group dynamics in cyberspace. (Suler, 1996)i''
9 Principles of Community:
Measured against Kim’s nine basic qualities or principles of community, (Suler 1996) Wildwood Gate also qualifies as a community of interest:
1. Define the purpose of the community: The introduction to Wildwood Gate carefully defines the nature of the online community forum, the interests that are covered and whom may or may not be invited to participate. Strict guidelines are followed in the admission of new members. There is nothing ambivalent about these initial steps.
2. Create distinct gathering places: The format, Avatars, User Names and uploaded images all create a mystical, and consistent feeling of metaphorical space.
3. Create member profiles that evolve over time: The member profiles and rankings are distinct and chosen by the members themselves. They can change them over time and often do. The ‘ranking’ system by number of posts has been eliminated.
4. Promote effective leadership: There are three moderators of Wildwood Gate. All are extremely effective leaders, online and off. Two hold sensei (black belt) ranks in various martial arts in which strong leadership is a requirement.
5. Define a clear-yet-flexible code of conduct: The code of conduct is clear. It is not flexible in some areas, for example, plagiarising materials from the site constitute immediate banishing. Other minor lapses in conduct would result in a warning/discussion.
6. Organize and promote cyclic events: Wildwood Gate, as a group, follows ancient Celtic traditions, celebrating the ‘sabbats’ , solstices and equinox events. They gather in physical celebration where possible. However, unlike (Hafner 1997) who states the Well flourished because of time spent face-to-face, in the Wildwood Gate, problems engendered online are usually solved online and problems occurring off line are solved off line.
7. Provide a range of roles that couple power with responsibility: There is much emphasis given to self-responsibility in this community, with shifting roles and tasks that evolve and change organically over time.
8. Facilitate member-created subgroups: This happened spontaneously in the beginning as subgroups moderated by new leaders where made along side the ‘main’ forum area.
9. Integrate the online environment with the "real" world: This is where Wildwood Gate excels as several members of the forum community live in the same local, both in Australia (original moderator’s residence) and overseas. To add, the moderator/author of the forum travels with book launches and signings, often meeting up with forum members around the world periodically. The members of Wildwood Gate also have, as those following shamanic teachings and ritual, deep experiences in myriad non-corporeal spaces making the integration of one 'reality' with another more familiar.
Please click on the comment button and offer feedback. Consider one or more of the following questions, or offer one of your own! What do you think about the concept of ‘metaphorical space’? What are your personal experience in this ‘realm’? What is YOUR definition of community? How do you feel the methodology of this case study measures against other studies you’ve read?
Can Wildwood Gate stand as a community of interest against the rigors and diversity of current academic definitions?
Some researchers feel the nature of virtual community as defined by topic of interest can be a trans-national, trans-cultural phenomenon that is essentially antithetical to the notion a public sphere and that re-conceptualization of community is necessary in order to define these online, virtual forums. (Fernback & Thompson 1995) Other researchers’ feel that the definition of ‘space’, the ‘somewhere’ required for online members to meet, is what needs redefining in order to view online interest groups as communities. (Gotved 2002)
Still other authors focus on the virtues of online communities, purporting they offer benefits not found in face-to-face communities. Each have their own characteristics, advantages and weaknesses. (Etzioni & Etzioni 1997) These ‘advantages’ include bonding and information exchange independent of proximity either spatial or temporal.
Communities can evolve across national borders and time zones. They can encompass individuals who are homebound because of illness, age, or handicap. They are safer--a major consideration in many cities. Online discussion groups or forums can accommodate many more individuals …and online communities have much stronger memories. Finally, people can explore new relationships or even new identities online. (Etizoni & Etizoni 1997)
Rheingold uses a biological metaphor to define community within cyberspace, likening them to the colonies of organisms that grow in a petri dish.(Rheingold 2000)Yet no one of the material studied thus far take into consideration a deeper definition of our perception of reality and existence itself as a determinant of online experiences.
The world of the Internet constitutes a space complete with metaphors that support spatial dimensions—we ‘talk” in chat rooms, we ‘visit’ sites, we ‘surf’ the net on waves that swell the information ecology. (Falconer 2005b) For those who participate, cyberspace is a place where community can develop over time. Wildwood Gate takes such concepts of ‘spaces’ step further.
“Reality’ for Wildwood Gate members necessitates quotation marks. They view the notion of “reality’ as consisting of the ‘seen’ and the ‘unseen’ real. For them, as for traditional shamans throughout all times and all cultures, there are ‘other’ realms of accessibility besides the three dimensional world.
“By ‘realms of accessibility’ I mean realms or places that are other than physical. They are not perceived by the five senses at the perimeter of your circle, but are accessed only …through the doorway of your centre.” (Ly de Angeles 2000)
This ‘doorway’ has been explored by many researchers in the fields of physics, phycology, and PSI or psychic phenomenon. Recent studies in quantum physics support a new paradigm regarding the nature of reality, space, time and consciousness.
If real is what you can feel, smell, ste and see, then 'real' is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. (Wachowski, Wachowski, & Silver, 1999)
Science or fiction?
All information we gain is interpreted from electrical signals in the brain. The brain can not distinguish between information that is received empirically, inspirationally, as a hallucination, as a stored memory or artificially activated by electrodes. (Dispenza, 1999) Because the brain can not differentiate between these sources of information, our interpretations of reality are wholly subjective. (Falconer 2005b)
Individuals placed in sensory deprivation chambers begin to hallucinate and synthesize entire inner realities. When the human mind is cut off from the so called physical world, it has a remarkable ability to create its own—trees, people, sounds, colors and smells. The entire physical universe itself is nothing more than patterns of neuronal energy firing off inside our heads. (Talbot, 1993)
What physicists are finding on the sub-atomic level (the molecular building blocks that make up our macro ‘reality’), supports the notion that imagined space is as ‘real’ as the computer desk one might be sitting at. Quantum interconnectedness demonstrates that separateness is an illusion and that in the sub-atomic landscapes all semblance of location breaks down—replaced by ‘superposition’ and ‘probabilities’. (Talbot, 1993) What our brain tells us is ‘space’ is, on the quantum level, one seamless and fundamental unity. On the subatomic level, there is no ‘out there’, only consciousness. (Falconer 2005b)
Wildwood Gate’s online forum is another aspect of the Covenant of Wildwood Gate itself. Both ‘places’ exist in both a non-corporeal domain, as the gateway to ‘other realms’ and as a physical one where meetings and ritual celebrations take place. Members make NO distinction between the two and the community that they form, on line and off maintains its integrity.
Ultimately for Wildwood Gate members, like for the hero of the Matrix, ‘there is no spoon’. There is no concrete distinction between the seen ‘real’ and the unseen ‘real’. To say their online forum does NOT constitute a community consisting of place, shared interests, growing and evolving relationships, trust and compassion, violates both traditional and non-traditional definitions of the word. For them, the online world of Wildwood Gate is ‘just another realm of accessibility.’
Please participate here with comments on the conclusion. Does it make sense to you? Do you think an understanding of ‘reality’ as perceived by different groups of people is essential for defining terms like ‘space’ and ‘online community’? What do you think is REAL?
American Heritage Dictionary (1975). NY. American Heritage Publishing Co. Inc
Antonijevic, Smiljana (2002). Sleepless in
First Monday, 7, 1. [Online Version] Retrieved
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_1/anton/index.html
Ltd.
March 16, 2006
de Angeles, Ly (2000). Witchcraft Theory & Practice. St. Paul, Minnesota.
Llewellyn Publications. p 113
August 11, 2005
[online Version] retrieved
http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/etzioni/editorial.html
New York
study period 2, 2005-Tutors
From, the
http://www.well.com/user/hlr/texts/VCcivil.html
New York
Vol. 5, No. 4. [online version]. Retrieved July 25, 20054 from
http://sac.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/5/4/405
Retrieved
York
Hafner, Katie. "The Epic Saga of The Well: The World's Most Influential Online
Community (and it's not AOL)". Wired, Vol. 5.05, May 1997. p 110-111.
Kim, A. J. (2000).
Online Communities .
Cyberspace: A Bibliographical
Hamburg
http://station03.olt.ubc.ca/index.php?title=Main_Page
Nakamura, L. (2002). Head-Hunting on the Internet: Identity Tourism, Avatars, and
Racial Passing in Textual and Graphic Chat Spaces in Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity,
and Identity on the Internet,
University
Chat," adapted from an Honours thesis written at the
Australia). Retrieved
http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/misc/electropolis.html
Frontier. MIT Press,
2005
Hang out On Line. JCMC 10 (1) [Online Version] Retrieved
of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 1,
271-295. [Online Version] Retrieved
http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/hrosenba/www/
l574/pdf/ridings_trust_virt-comm.pdf
Psychology, Science and
Retrieved
http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/psycyber.html
Talbot, M. (1993). Mysticism and the New Physics.( 2nd ed.).
Wachowski, A. (writer/director), Wachowski, (writer/director) L., Silver. J
(producer) (1999). The Matrix. [Motion Picture] Australia/USA. Warner Brothers.
Watson, Neissim (1997). Virtual Culture, Identity and Communications in
Cyberspace.
Community: A Case Study of the Phish.net Fan Club.(102-132)
Sage Publications.
Photo References in Appearance Order
Rae, Jan (2005) Kim Falconer Private collection.
from: www.iways.co.uk
http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Social/ancient/
http://images.art.com/images/products/regular/10286000/
McCullagh, Declan (n.d), Macas Internet Café. Retrieved
Rae, Jan (2003) Visitation, Private Collection.
Briggs, Aaron (2002) Gorgwaters. Private Collection.
Please contribute by offering a comment on
the references. What’s missing? What would
you add? Which have you read?
Final thoughts? Comments?